Should we believe scientist false assumptions of the evolution theory? Should we trust Darwin's antiquated theory even in today's modern times?

Evolution: Scientific Fact Or An Antiquated Theory? No scientific theory, it seems, can bridge the gulf between absolute nothingness and a full-fledged universe...

All the hard data in the life sciences show that evolution is not occurring today, all the real data in the earth sciences show it did not occur in the past, and all the genuine data in the physical sciences show it is not possible at all. Nevertheless, evolution is almost universally accepted as a fact in all the natural sciences. Yet no matter how convincing such disproofs of evolution might appear, no matter how contradictory and unreal much of the Darwinian framework might now seem to anyone not committed to its defense, as philosophers of scene like Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend have pointed out, it is impossible to falsify theories by references to the facts or indeed by any sort of rational or empirical argument. The history of science amply testifies to what Kuhn has termed'the priority of the paradigm' and provides many fascinating examples of the extraordinary lengths to which members of the scientific community will go to defend a theory just as long as it hold sufficient intrinsic appeal. If we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find-over and over again-not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another.-Dr. Derek Ager The known fossil record FAILS to document a single example of phyletic evolution accomplishing a major morphologic transition and hence offers no evidence that the gradualists model can be valid. -Dr. Steven M. Stanley A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggest that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. -Sir Fred Hoyle Science and faith are not at war. When scientific evidence and biblical teaching are correctly interepted, they can and do support each other.I'd say to anyone who doubts that: investigate the evidence yourself. -Meyer

Evolution is not a formulation of the true scientific method. They realize evolution means the initial formation of unknown organisms from unknown chemicals produced in an atmosphere or ocean of unknown composition under unknown conditions, which organisms have then climbed an unknown evolutionary ladder by an unknown process leaving unknown evidence. -Dr Randy L Wysong May not a future generation well ask how any scientist, in full possession of his intellectual faculties and with adequate knowledge of information theory could ever execute the feat of cognitive acrobatics necessary to sincerely believe that a supremely complex machine system of information, storage and retrieval, servicing millions of cells, diagnosing defects and then repairing them in a teleonomic Van Newman machine manner, arose in randomness- the antipole of information? In other words, How could any scientist in possession of the modern facts we now have logically continue to exercise faith in naturalistic evolution? As molecular biologist Michael Denton observes of the created order of living things, 'To common sense it does indeed appear absurd to propose that chance could have thrown together devices of such complexity and ingenuity that they appear to represent the very epitome of perfection." -Dr A.E. Wilder-Smith Astronomers have discovered that the characteristics of the universe, of our galaxy and of our solar system are so finely tuned to support life that the only reasonable explanation for this is the forethought of a personal, intelligent Creator.. In fact the more astronomers learn about the origin and development of the universe, the more evidence they accumulate for the existence of God, and for the God of the Bible in particular. -Astronomer Hugh Ross The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change... All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between major groups are characteristically abrupt.-Stephen Jay Gould It remains true, as every paleontologist knows, that most new species, genera, and families and that nearly all new categories above the level of families appear in the record suddenly and are not led up to by known, gradual, completely continuous transitional sequences. -Dr. George Gaylord Simpson(Evolutionists) Whatever ideas authorities may have on the subject, the lungfish, like every other major group of fish that I know, have their origins firmly based on nothing. -E. White There is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all... It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned natures numbers to make the Universe... The impression of design is overwhelming. Further, the laws of physics themselves seem to be the product of exceedingly ingenious design. -Paul Davies Many evolutionary biologists admit that science cannot categorically excluse the possibility that some kind of deity still might exsist. Nor can they deny the possibility of a divine designer who so masks his creation activity in apparently natural processes as to escape scientific detection. Yet for most scientist materialists such an undetectable entity hardly seems worthy of consideration. -Stephen C. Meyer Science doesn't have the slightest idea how life began. No generally accepted theory exsists, and the steps leading from a barren primordial world to the fragile chemistry of life seem imponderable. -Gregg Easterbrook The universal experience of paleontology...is that while the rocks have continually yielded new and exciting and even bizarre forms of life...what they have never yielded is any of Darwin's myriads of transitional forms. Despite the tremendous increase in geological activity in every corner of the globe and despite the discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not been discovered and the fossil record is about as discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the Origin. The intermediates have remained as elusive as ever and their absence remains, a century later, on of the most striking characteristics of the fossil record. -Michael Denton We are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of the archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of transition between the classes such as reptiles and birds, or between smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanism of transition remain unkown. -Pierre Lecomte du Nouy(evolutionist) Archaeoraptor(National Geographic fake fossil) is just the tip of the iceberg. There are scores of fake fossils out there, and they have cast a dark shadow over the whole field. When you go to these fossil shows, it's difficult to tell which ones are fakes and which ones are not. I have heard there is a fake-fossil factory in northeast China, in Liaoning Province, near the deposits where many of these recent alleged feathered dinosaurs were found. -Alan Feduccia If the laws of physics are fine-tuned for life, as contemporary physicists are discovering, then perhaps there's a designer who fine-tuned them. If there's information in the cell, as molecular biology shows, then this suggests intelligent design. To get life going in the first place would have required biological information, the implications point beyond the material realm to a prior intelligent cause. -Stephen C Meyer The best date we have are exactly what I would have predicted had I nothing to go on but the first five books of Moses, the Psalms and the Bible as a whole. -Arno Penzias(Nobel prize winner) Naturalism is on hard times in cosmology, the deeper you get into it, the harder it is to get rid of the God hypothesis. Taken together, the Big Bang and general relativity provide a scientific description of what Christians call creatio ex nihilo-creation out of nothing. -Meyer Take the expansion rate of the universe, which is fine-tuned to one part in a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion. That is, if it were changed by one part in either direction- a little faster, or a little slower-we could not have a universe that would be capable of supporting life. -Meyer Richard Dawkins of Oxford said that "the machine code of the genes is uncannily computer-like." If you reflect on that, you realize that computers run on software programs that are produced by intelligent engineers. Every experience we have about information -whether it's a computer code, hieroglyphic inscription, a book, or a cave painting-points toward intelligence. The same is true about the information inside every cell in every living creature. -Meyer PHD