|
Should we believe scientist false assumptions of
the evolution theory? Should we trust Darwin's antiquated theory even
in today's modern times? |
Evolution: Scientific Fact Or An Antiquated Theory? No scientific theory, it seems, can bridge the gulf between absolute nothingness and a full-fledged universe... |
|
All the hard data in the life sciences show that evolution is not occurring today, all the real data in the earth sciences show it did not occur in the past, and all the genuine data in the physical sciences show it is not possible at all. Nevertheless, evolution is almost universally accepted as a fact in all the natural sciences. Yet no matter how convincing such disproofs of evolution might appear, no matter how contradictory and unreal much of the Darwinian framework might now seem to anyone not committed to its defense, as philosophers of scene like Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend have pointed out, it is impossible to falsify theories by references to the facts or indeed by any sort of rational or empirical argument. The history of science amply testifies to what Kuhn has termed'the priority of the paradigm' and provides many fascinating examples of the extraordinary lengths to which members of the scientific community will go to defend a theory just as long as it hold sufficient intrinsic appeal. If we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find-over and over again-not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another.-Dr. Derek Ager The known fossil record FAILS to document a single example of phyletic evolution accomplishing a major morphologic transition and hence offers no evidence that the gradualists model can be valid. -Dr. Steven M. Stanley
|
Evolution is not a formulation of the true scientific method. They realize evolution means the initial formation of unknown organisms from unknown chemicals produced in an atmosphere or ocean of unknown composition under unknown conditions, which organisms have then climbed an unknown evolutionary ladder by an unknown process leaving unknown evidence. -Dr Randy L Wysong May not a future generation well ask how any scientist, in full possession of his intellectual faculties and with adequate knowledge of information theory could ever execute the feat of cognitive acrobatics necessary to sincerely believe that a supremely complex machine system of information, storage and retrieval, servicing millions of cells, diagnosing defects and then repairing them in a teleonomic Van Newman machine manner, arose in randomness- the antipole of information? In other words, How could any scientist in possession of the modern facts we now have logically continue to exercise faith in naturalistic evolution? As molecular biologist Michael Denton observes of the created order of living things, 'To common sense it does indeed appear absurd to propose that chance could have thrown together devices of such complexity and ingenuity that they appear to represent the very epitome of perfection." -Dr A.E. Wilder-Smith Astronomers have discovered that the characteristics of the universe, of our galaxy and of our solar system are so finely tuned to support life that the only reasonable explanation for this is the forethought of a personal, intelligent Creator.. In fact the more astronomers learn about the origin and development of the universe, the more evidence they accumulate for the existence of God, and for the God of the Bible in particular. -Astronomer Hugh Ross The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change... All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between major groups are characteristically abrupt.-Stephen Jay Gould It remains true, as every paleontologist knows, that most new species, genera, and families and that nearly all new categories above the level of families appear in the record suddenly and are not led up to by known, gradual, completely continuous transitional sequences. -Dr. George Gaylord Simpson(Evolutionists) Whatever ideas authorities may have on the subject, the lungfish, like every other major group of fish that I know, have their origins firmly based on nothing. -E. White There is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all... It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned natures numbers to make the Universe... The impression of design is overwhelming. Further, the laws of physics themselves seem to be the product of exceedingly ingenious design. -Paul Davies
|